R(W) THOMAS SCOTT of Bucklesham, yeoman. 12 May 1631
Sick and weak. To eldest son THOMAS SCOTT, 1 tenement in Kirton,
6 acres of which is wood, now occupied by WILLIAM MILNER. Also 1
tenement in Bucklesham, from which tenement testator’s wife
ELIZABETH has a jointure during her lifetime. To son WILLIAM
SCOTT tenement in Waldringfield, Newbourne and Henly. To son
ROBERT SCOTT, tenement in Swilland, late TURNER’S & JAQUES. To
son CHRISTOPHER SCOTT tenement in Trimley St.Martin, lately
purchased from THOMAS PITT: he to receive this tenement together
with tenement in Ipswich St. Lawrence, late purchased form SIMON &
SAMUEL TUNELL now occupied by one CHIRCH, when he reaches 21. To
his youngest son JOHN £100 when he reaches 21. To daughter
ELIZABETH tenement in Bucklesham, late purchased from ANDREW COCK
& ROBERT MAULSTER, when she reaches the age of 21. Benefit of
survivorship to his children with regard to their legacies. To
son THOMAS the biggest pot, one silver spoon. To son WILLIAM
middle sized pot, one silver spoon. To son ROBERT the other pot,
one silver spoon. To son CHRISTOPHER one silver spoon. To son
JOHN one silver spoon. To daughter ELIZABETH one silver spoon.
Residue of household utensils, other implements to be equally
divided between the testator’s wife and children; wife to retain
childrens portions until they reach their majority. To the poor
of Bucklesham 20s. Residue of goods to wife Elizabeth and son
Thomas, they to be executors, and to pay debts and funeral
Expenses eexecutors to enter Bond of 20s with testators brother in law
Robert Armond, who is appointed Supervisor and is
Given 10s for his trouble. Executors to allow no wast or to
Strip lands, and also executors to pay admission fines when
Christopher and Elizabeth take up their lands, Executors also to
Maintain and educate the younger children of the testator
Witnesses Simon Pettiward, Thomas Yonge (x) Margaret Bennett (x) Pro at Ipswich 22 June 1631
Bucklesham based family with one son – William Scott living in Waldringfield, Newbourne and Henly (should this be Hemly?)