Skip to main content

Minor changes to text below.


 

“High marks in the competition of curious local mispronunciations of place names may fairly be claimed for the case of Waldringfield, near Ipswich. If you do in Suffolk as the Suffolkers do, you must call it “Wunuerf’l,”which is also their pronunciation of “wonderful,” a favourite Suffolk word”. – Pronunciation, according to the Ipswich Evening Star of 23rd September 1904

Here we gather together references to the name of our village and take a look at its history.

The name Waldringfield is first documented in the Will of Bishop Theodred in 955. 1) Theodred – Electronic Sawyer – S1526 Will of Bishop Theodred. Next, the 11C Domesday Book describes “Waldringafelda” and “Waldringafelda Minima” or Lesser Waldringfield.  After this time all sources use minor spelling variations and the lesser variant disappears. (Cross Ref |14C section) Waldringfield Heath is unlikely, as Arnott suggested, to be Lesser Waldringfield as it does not appear until the 19C. No other settlements called Waldringfield have been found in the English speaking countries or in Europe. There is a Waldringfield road in Basildon but that’s a new town.

The sources, summarised below,  agree that the name consists of a personal element of ‘Waldhere‘, a connector ‘inga’ and the geographical ‘field’. Arnott suggests that the ‘inga’ element refers to the settlement of a particular group of people as opposed to unconnected individuals.

Scarfe makes the observation 2) Scarfe, Norman. Suffolk in the Middle Ages : Studies in Places and Place-Names, the Sutton Hoo Ship-Burial, Saints, Mummies, and Crosses, Domesday Book, and Chronicles of Bury Abbey. Boydell, 2007. that we are the only Suffolk -field that is on relatively dry soil. He also mentions that -fields were often associated with Roman settlements, there may have been one at Martlesham, and used as fuel supplies for kilns, baths etc.  The English Place-Name Society 3) -fields – English Place-Name Society – The University of Nottingham.  shows that there are 521 settlement Names in Suffolk. Of these 107 are -tons, 100-hams, and 34 -fields. Inspection of the soil type map reveals that all the other village-fields are on clay soil with only ours on sandy soil which is worthy of note.

Wald in place-names can refer to wood or forest often referring to cleared, open upland ground according to Ekwall.  Waldingfield near Sudbury, for example, he describes as the field of the dwellers by the wood.  Our Waldringfield isn’t upland and the Wald does not appear to have this meaning according to the above sources. Rather the Wald element comes from a personal name Waldhere, an Anglo Saxon name and form of “Walter”. It is a compound of a wald element meaning “might, power, authority” and here signifying “army leader, commander, warrior” 4) Wald – Wiktionary.Org Presumably the wald element in Raedwald has the same meaning.

The personal name connection makes the name of greater interest than most nearby villages which are named after a local farm holder or a geographical feature. We don’t know who Waldhere was so the three suggestions that follow are speculation. The real story, that we’ll probably never know, may well be less interesting.

WLD SF-466067 Early-Medieval Sword Pommel CC Licence attribution

  • Bawdsey and Hemley may also be of interest as they relate to a personal name. The estuary is by definition the route from the sea and an avenue of attack. Bawdsey (Baldhere’s Island) would, together with Walton Castle (a Roman structure so there at the time), defend the entrance and Waldringfield has a commanding position half-way up.river Hemley also fits this pattern as it then sat at a branch in the channel. Hemley is said to derive from Helma’s Lea where Helma signifies ‘protector’. 5)Helma – see Wikipedia Germanic names. The name, however, has only one element 6)Elements – see Anglo-Saxon Monothematic Names and may be of lower status.  Were Baldhere, Helma and Waldhere military leaders commanding key positions at some time? If this were the case then they probably did this from the early days of settlement in the 6C which makes the name about 1500 years old in the days of one of the early Anglo Saxon rulers well before Raedwald. We could fantasise that it was Waldhere or one of his men whose Early-Medieval Sword Pommel and parts of a dagger were found in the village. The pommel dates from between 700 and 900.
  • There was a Bishop of London called Waldhere in the late 7C 7) Waldhere (bishop). 2019. Wikipedia who had dealings with the King of the East Saxons in 695. 8) Waldhere dealings – Hunt, W. (1899) Waldhere Sidney Lee (ed.). Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900.Volume 59. This may have been King Ealdwulf 9)King Ealdwulf Wikipedia The role of a Bishop in that time extended into the realms of politics and warfare and this was a politically turbulent era. Bishop Waldhere was a key intermediary and it’s quite possible that gifts of land might have been made to him of which our village was part. This was nearly a Century later than King Raedwald, who reigned from c. 599 to c. 624, so there wasn’t a direct connection between King and Bishop. If Bishop Waldhere was connected with the village in late 7C then it ties in with the will of Bishop Theodred (an interesting character in his own right) in the mid 10C.
  • There is an Anglo Saxon poem called Waldere 10) Waldere Poem. Wikipedia.  telling heroic tales of Waldere and Hildegyth, their love, crimes and battle wielding his great sword Mimming (not upon Hildegyth) but all ends happily. However, this dates from about the 10C has no ‘h’ and too grand to refer to anyone connected with our humble village. Could the sword pommel above be from Mimming?!

Waldhere poem fragment

So, the name is Anglo Saxon, perhaps 1300 to 1500 years old and different in form to most nearby villages. It also stands out from the thirty-three other -fields in Suffolk. Beyond that, we can only guess but there’s a lot more to the name than we thought at first.

Summary of references found to Waldringfield in Place Name books, Guides and Chronicles:   
  • 1086 Domesday Book details of two Manors.
  • 1587 Holinshed’s Chronicles – Merely mentions that the river passes us. 11) Holinshed, R. (1976) Holinshed’s Chronicles / 4, England. Ams Press.
  • 1618 Suffolk in the 17C The Breviary of Suffolk by Reyce – Merely mentions that the river passes us. There is a mention of Thomas Appleton but this may be a confusion with Waldingfield. 12) Reyce, R. (1902) Suffolk in the 17th century : the breviary of Suffolk. Murray.
  • 1764 John Kirbys Suffolk Traveller – Minor information on the Lords of the Manor. 13) The Suffolk traveller : Kirby, John, 1690-1753 : Internet Archive.
  • 1791 Universal British Directory – nothing.
  • 1847 A topographical and genealogical history of the County of Suffolk by Page Augustine -Merely repeats Kirby 14) Page, A. (1847) A topographical and genealogical history of the County of Suffolk,. Ipswich F. Pawsey.
  • 1905 Copingers Manors of Suffolk – Comprehensive details on the Manors. 15) Walter Arthur Copinger (1905) The manors of Suffolk : notes on their history and devolution, with some illustrations of the old manor houses. T.F. Unwin, -09.
  • 1913 The place names of Suffolk by Skeat – The field of the Wald(he)rings or sons of Waldhere. 16) Skeat, W.W. (1913) The Place Names of Suffolk. Printed For The Cambridge Antiquarian Society.
  • 1936 The Concise Oxford Dictionary Of English Place Names by Ekwall – records first mention as c950, “The Feld of Waldhere’s people”. 17) Eilert Ekwall (1947) The Concise Oxford dictionary of English place-names, by Eilert Ekwall. 3rd edition. The Clarendon Press (Printed By C. Batey.
  • 1946 Place Names of the Deben Valley Parishes by W G Arnott – – “Field of the Wald(he)rings or sons of Waldhere. A tribal name of great age and interest, indicating settlement of the district by a family rather than by one or two individuals.”
  • 2010 Suffolk in the middle ages by Norman Scarfe – The field of Waldhere’s people.
  • 2016 A Dictionary of Suffolk Place Names by Keith Briggs and Kelly Kilpatrick – gives the origin of the name slightly differently as – “Open land of the Waldringas where Waldringa is an Old English folk name.” They relate this to Waldhere. 18) Briggs, K. & Kilpatrick, K. (2016) Dictionary of Suffolk place-names. English Place-Name Soc.

 

References[+]

alyson

About alyson

10 Comments

  • Margaret says:

    Line 7 beginning with ‘Osgot’ I think the ‘s’ at the end of Waldingfield is confusing. I know it is there because we know there is a Greater and Little Waldingfield but the text does not explain that

  • Michael says:

    Alteration to punctuation: The paragraph starting: The sources—- should read, a connector ‘inga’

  • Gareth says:

    Charles, when you have placed your comments in the box I will add my own, saying that your version reads better but there should be a comma after Waldingfield (in the first line) and that the third line might be better if it read “However, analysis of the locations of the bequeathed estates shows a stronger ……….’

  • John Ogden says:

    – Not entirely clear until a paragraph later why ‘Bawdsey and Hemley may be of interest’, so you could add after this ‘…in this regard as hypothesised below’.
    – re 2nd suggestion for Waldhere; 1st line a little grammatically muddled. Perhaps better to say ‘There was a Bishop of London called Waldhere in the late 7C…’
    – Need space between ‘1300’ and ‘to’ in concluding para.
    Amazing bit of work though Bob – I never suspected you could squeeze so much out of the name of our Village!

  • Bob Crawley says:

    Comments included.
    Bob

  • Charles Croydon says:

    Overall I liked this section of the village name and learnt a lot so I am grateful that it has been written, but asked to make comment using these
    Types
    1. typos and grammar.
    2. sentence style.
    3 overall style – i.e. too academic or colloquial.
    4. content – is it relevant, will people understand it?
    5. how it fits with other sections, duplication, omissions etc. Hard to judge until you’ve seen the lot.

    the points I want to make are below
    ……………………………………….

    Paragraph 2 and subsequent paragraphs Type 2 superscript “1)” – in my view no closing bracket should be used as part of a superscript note this comes from

    https://guides.lib.uw.edu/hsl/ama/intext

    While this may be current usage in the United States it may be dominant in the UK by the time the is published

    I appreciate there are other views such as at

    https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-fmcc-english1/chapter/mla-in-text-citations/

    in which the IEEE format uses open and closing square brackets, example: The sky is blue [1].

    Then there is also the approach in the link below

    https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-fmcc-english1/chapter/mla-in-text-citations/

    Type 5 comment – Whatever is used for ‘in text citations’ has to be consistent throughout the book.

    I like that aspect that if one is looking at an electronic version rather than a printed version and you ‘hover’ with a mouse over the superscript then the citation appears – but I do not know if this is consistent throughout the book and if the reader is informed of this facility at the start of the electronic version of the book –

    ………………………………………..
    Paragraph 4 Types 1,2,4 paragraph is
    ”
    Osgot inherited other estates so he was the landholder rather than an inhabitant. It could be that the reference is to the Waldingfields (no R) near Sudbury, sometimes misspelt as Waldringfield that are frequent causes of confusion. However, analysis of the bequeathed estates’ locations shows a stronger relationship between them and Waldringfield than with Waldingfield. We think therefore that the Will refers to our village.
    ”

    I comment as follows – the place which could be confused with our Waldringfield is Waldingfield near Sudbury so in line 1 of the above paragraph the word “Waldingfields” should not be in plural and have the letter s at the end. While I understand what is meant by “(no R)”, as the letter never appears in CAPITALS it would be more accurate to say “(no r)”. it may be better to rephrase the whole paragraph as

    “Osgot inherited other estates so he was the landholder rather than an inhabitant.It could be that the reference is to Waldingfield a village near Sudbury. This has a similar spelling to our village and was sometimes misspelt as Waldringfield which is a frequent causes of confusion. However, analysis of the bequeathed estates’ locations shows a stronger relationship between them and Waldringfield than with Waldingfield. We think therefore that the Will refers to our village”

    ……………………………………………
    Paragraph 5 Type 2 superscript “2) 3)” hyphen should be used, that is superscript “2-3” this come from

    https://guides.lib.uw.edu/hsl/ama/intext

    which says “When more than 2 references are cited at a given place in the manuscript, use hyphens to join the first and last numbers of a closed series; use commas without space to separate other parts of a multiple citation. Ex. As reported previously,1,4-7,19,24”

    …………………………………………………
    Paragraph 8 Type 5 “(Cross Ref |14C section)” – comment – what is the purpose of the vertical line

    ……………………………………………..
    Paragraph 13 Type 1 grammer, type 2 style, type 4 relevant “Waldringfield has a strategic position at a choke point half-way up.” …. “Were Baldhere, Helma and Waldhere military leaders commanding key positions at some time?” – comment “has” infers current and I would not say Waldringfield is a “choke point” that is “In military strategy, a choke point (or chokepoint) is a geographical feature on land such as a valley, defile or a bridge or at sea such as a strait, which an armed force is forced to pass, sometimes on a substantially narrower front and therefore greatly decreasing its combat power, to reach its objective.” To me Waldringfield’s current major characteristic in military strategy is that it has beach rather than mud. However the paragraph is talking about 6C and I have seen no evidence that it was then a “choke point” and if “choke point” is not substantiated then the proposition that Waldhere commanded a key positions is weakened. Thus Type 4 relevant. This paragraph then becomes weaker through the partial use of a conditional phrase. This should have the form of ‘if, then, otherwise’ but takes the form of’ ‘if, then, fantasise’ Thus Type 1 grammer, type 2 style – it would be best to rewrite this paragraph

  • Bob Crawley says:

    May move first part to a 14C intro

  • Bob Crawley says:

    I’ve moved Osgot to Pre Walk Briefing and will deal with him there.
    Noted on references but will be different in book.
    Think strategic chokepoint position is fixed.

    This is now closed.

  • Gareth says:

    Not sure what is the current status of this chapter as there have been no comments for 16 days since discussion was declared ‘closed’. As official closing day is tomorrow I feel I should make the following comments now
    What about ‘Waldringfield – the name’ as a title instead of ‘Our name’?
    The first sentence is not necessary.
    The name Waldringfield was first documented…… i.e. past tense
    lesser variant should read ‘lesser’ variant
    Reference required for Arnott’s view
    Capital R for Road when referring to Waldringfield Road in Basildon and that is a new town (not that’s a new town)
    The sentence about Scarffe is not clear – e.g. what was being used for fuel for baths etc? Why is it important to note that Waldringfield is the only -field out of 34 which is on sandy soil or relatively dry soil?
    Reference required for Ekwall
    Second sentence of para beginning ‘Wald’ should omit ‘our’, start with the name Waldringfield and read Waldringfield is not upland i.e. avoid isn’t
    Next sentence should read: …. a form of “Walter”. i.e. insert ‘a’
    Next para: we do not (avoid ‘don’t’) and we will (avoid ‘we’ll’)
    Para commencing Bawdsey and Hemley. Comma after structure in the bracket after Walton Castle so that it reads (…Roman structure, so there at the time). End of that sentence should read ……..up-river. Hemley………
    Sentence beginning ‘If this were the case….’ needs a break. Suggest comma after 6C
    Next para needs full stop after Ealdwulf
    Sentence beginning Bishop Waldhere requires ‘it is’ instead of it’s
    Next sentence, at the end, should read: 624, so there was no direct connection……… (We also need to discuss the use of AD and BC!!)
    Next sentence should read: ………then that would tie in with……….
    The last bullet point (bullet points – I thought they were banned!) does not read right about ‘their love, crimes and battle wielding’. I am also a bit concerned that having argued against this poem having anything to do with Waldringfield you speculate as to whether the pommel discovered hereabouts might belong to the Mimming.
    Last line ‘ there is’ not there’s

    • Margaret says:

      1. I think “ix worthy of note” could be changed to “gives food for thought” or somesuch to make clearer
      2. “position half-way up.river Hemley” does the full stop need moving to after “river” rather than before

Leave a Reply